Chevy Silverado/ GMC Sierra Forum Discuss the Chevrolet Silverado and GMC Sierra here.

Used Chevy trucks ?.....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #11  
Old 08-13-2011, 08:59 AM
Razoo's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Central Georgia
Posts: 139
Default

Using an automatic to control your speed going down a hill is very easy. First thing to remember is to take it out of over drive. By not allowing the trans to shift into OD, you will get a slight braking effect from the engine. You can also go down to 2nd gear if necessary, but unless you're pulling a pretty big load, it won't be necessary.

A few months ago, I pulled my 2000 Silverado 1500 back from the west coast, and I use my '08 GMC to do it, but that's not recommended. I should have use one of my heavier trucks to do this, but I was out there with the GMC, and my son asked if I could take the Checy back with me.
We rented a trailer from U-haul (had to lie about what we were towing), and I brought both trucks back to Georgia.
Going through the Rockies was an experience! But, the 1/2 ton GMC handled it OK. I was able to maintain speed going up the steeper grades, and coming down I dropped the truck out of OD. I was able to maintain speed, and not fly down the mountains.
Even with the weight of another truck and a trailer behind my 1/2 ton, 5.3L GNC, I only used the "Tow/Haul" feature when starting from a full stop. Once I was on the interstate (or even just rolling above 25 mph) it was no longer necessary.

I spent 3 nights on the road, and drove 12 to 16 hours a day. I experienced no issues other than the tire webs on the trailer, that go around the front tires, kept coming loose. I'd check them and tighten them every time I stopped for gas. When I got to Tucomcari, New Mexico, I pulled over at a truck stop, and bought 2 more ratcheting load straps. I wrapped them around the rear axle, and brought them forward to the front of the trailer, and ratcheted them down tightly. From then on, it was no longer an issue, though I still checked them at every stop. The only other issue is that the Chevy was a little long for the U-haul trailer. It a 2000 regular cab, log bed. With the front tires against the trailers front stops, the rear tires were less than 3" from the rear of the trailer bed. In fact, about 30% of the rear tires overhung the rear of the trailer, as did the rest of the pick up bed!!!

Luckily, for me, I had no problems with the drive that was about 3100 miles, one way, through hills, mountains (the Rockies), deserts, plains, and whatever else. To me it was a testiment to the new GM light duty trucks, though if given the opportunity to plan that adventure I would have taken my Cummins crew cab, dually 3500, and my own goose neck flat bed!!! lol
 
  #12  
Old 08-13-2011, 05:00 PM
Oatmeal256's Avatar
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: The Coal Country...
Posts: 11
Default

Me and the wife was talking last night and we came up with all the trucks Ive owned, all of them was a standard trans....and ive had 7 trucks...been driving since I was 18.....

Thats some good info guys, thanks....

Maybe its time I did go with a auto trans...
I know the wife tells me all the time I need to get me a automatic this time due to all the pain ive been having out of my legs and feet...

The trans that i mentioned been replaced, that wasnt me, it was a guy I used to work with, I too think he got took..
 
  #13  
Old 08-15-2011, 01:34 PM
lunaticgt's Avatar
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 2
Default

I prefer automatic in a truck myself, especially if towing, my concern, and I think oatmeal256s probably as well, is that on a manual you can just replace a worn clutch pretty cheap but an auto trans can be very much more expensive to the point of doubling the cost of a used truck in the 1996 to 2002 range.

Are chevy automatics in this year range pretty dependable and capable of hitting 200k with reasonable expectation?
 
  #14  
Old 08-15-2011, 03:05 PM
Razoo's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Central Georgia
Posts: 139
Default

As I've stated in another thread. My 2000 Silverado 4.8L with an auto trans has 223,000 miles on it, and the only repair I've done to it so far is to replace the a/c compressor. Everything else is still working as good as new.

I have and continue to follow the recommended service intervals for the truck, including scheduled trans service.
 
  #15  
Old 08-15-2011, 05:06 PM
Oatmeal256's Avatar
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: The Coal Country...
Posts: 11
Default

Went and looked at 2 Chevys today..

The first one was a 99 ext cab, has 152*** miles on it, a 5.3 eng, auto trans, 4wd, was a beauty there asking 7000.00 for this one...
2nd one was a 2002, reg cab, has 100900 miles on it, 5.3 eng, auto trans, 4wd, short bed truck, for 8000.00...nice truck also....cash only for these...
 
  #16  
Old 08-16-2011, 07:09 AM
GMCSierraFan's Avatar
Administrator
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,560
Default

Both Great trucks with that setup. They probably both have a great gear range (3.42 or 3.73) and the 5.3 engine with that tranny is bulletproof IF MAINTAINED CORRECTLY!!!!!!! I'm not even going to begin going on my rant about maintenance or lack thereof really ****ing up a vehicle and making a used car buyer very upset.
 
  #17  
Old 08-16-2011, 08:55 AM
MrDragon's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 304
Default

I have to admit that I was really surprised when GM started using the 5.3. Being that it translates to a 327 and being an awesome engine, was never much of a truck motor until niw. They did their homework and got it right.
 
  #18  
Old 08-18-2011, 02:13 PM
Oatmeal256's Avatar
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: The Coal Country...
Posts: 11
Default

Maintance, is the key right there..
I know each truck Ive bought used has had over or right at 100000 miles on it and Ive got 5 years out of each of them and when I sold them they still had life left in them...

Ive heard the guys I work with talking about the 5.3 eng, in which they said its the 327 and its a good eng.....

Wonder what kind a mpg it gets been its a auto trans ?...
Is it true, that a V8 will get better gas mileage than a V6 will ?..
 
  #19  
Old 08-18-2011, 07:15 PM
Razoo's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Central Georgia
Posts: 139
Default

Actually the 5.3L engine is a 325 cubic inches. 5.3 L (5328 cc (325.1 cu in))

And it a much better engine than the old 327 was.

Just saying....


Here ya go...

5300 (5.3L)

Generation III

The Vortec 5300, or LM7/L59/LM4/L33, is a V8 truck engine. It is a stroked (by 9 mm) version of the Vortec 4800 and replaced the 5700 L31. L59 denoted a flexible fuel version of the standard fuel LM7 engine.
Power output is 270-305 hp (213-220 kW) and torque is 315 lbf·ft (427 N·m) to 335 lbf·ft (454 N·m). Displacement is 5.3 L (5,328 cc (325.1 cu in)) from 96.01 mm 3.78 inch bore and 92.00 mm stroke 3.622 inch stroke . Vortec 5300s are built in St. Catharines, Ontario, Romulus, Michigan, and Silao, Mexico.
LM7

The LM7 (VIN code "T") Vortec 5300 was introduced in 1999, and can be considered the "garden variety" version of the Generation III 5.3 liter V8's. The LM7 has an iron block and aluminum heads.
LM7 applications:
L59

The L59 (VIN code "Z") Vortec 5300 is a flexible fuel version of the LM7.
L59 applications:
LM4

The LM4 (VIN code "P") Vortec 5300 is an aluminum block version of the LM7, and had a short production life. It should not be confused with the L33 described below.
LM4 applications:
L33

The L33 (VIN code "B") is an aluminum block version of the LM7, and was referred to as the Vortec 5300 HO in marketing materials. Power increased by 35 hp (26 kW), to 330 hp (250 kW), over the LM7, and torque was unchanged. It was only available on extended cab 4WD pickup trucks. Only 25% of trucks made in 2005 had the L33 engine.
L33 applications:
Generation IV

First introduced in 2005, the Generation IV Vortec 5300 engines share all the improvements and refinements found in other Generation IV engines. At present, four versions of the 5300 are in production: 2 iron block versions (LY5 and LMG) and 2 aluminum block versions (LH6 and LC9). All versions feature the Active Fuel Management system.
LH6

The LH6 with Active Fuel Management replaced the LM4 for 2005, and was the first of the Generation IV small block V8 truck engines to go into production. It is the aluminum block counterpart to the LY5.
LH6 applications:
LY5

Introduced in 2007, the LY5 Vortec 5300 is the replacement for the LM7 Generation III engine. For SUV applications, it is rated at 320 hp (239 kW) and 340 ft•lbf (461 N•m) of torque; for pickup truck applications, it is rated at 315 hp and 338 ft•lbf of torque.
LY5 applications:
LMG

The LMG Vortec 5300 is the flexible-fuel version of the LY5. Power and torque ratings for SUV and pickup truck applications are the same as each application's LY5 rating.
LMG applications:
LC9

The LC9 Vortec 5300 is the Flex-Fuel version of the LH6, and is found in 4WD models. SUV applications are rated at 310 hp (231 kW) and 335 ft•lbf (454 N•m) of torque.
LC9 applications:
LH8

The LH8 Vortec 5300 is a variant of the 5.3 L Gen IV small block V8 modified to fit in the engine bay of the GMT 345 SUV and GMT 355 trucks. It produces 300 hp (220 kW) at 5200 rpm and 320 lbf·ft (430 N·m) at 4000 rpm. It has a displacement of 5,328 cc (325.1 cu in).[23]
LH8 applications:



Also, when GM first introduced the 4.8L, many people, even to this day referred to it as a 283. It isn't. It's actualy 291 Cubes.

Here's some skinny on it....

4800 (4.8L)


LR4

The Vortec 4800 LR4 is a Generation III small block V8 truck engine. Displacement is 4.8 L (290 cu in) with a 96.01 mm3.78 inch bore and 83 mm 3.27 inch stroke. It is the smallest of the Generation III Vortec truck engines and was the replacement for the 5.0 L 5000 L30. The LR4 produces 270 horsepower (200 kW) to 290 horsepower (220 kW) and 285 lbf·ft (386 N·m) to 305 lbf·ft (414 N·m), depending on the model year and application. LR4s are manufactured at St. Catharines, Ontario and Romulus, Michigan.
LR4 applications:
LY2

The Vortec 4800 LY2 is a Generation IV small block V8 truck engine. Like its LR4 predecessor, it gets its displacement from a 96.01 mm bore and 83 mm stroke. The smallest member of the Generation IV Vortec engine family, it is unique in that it is the only member of that family that does not feature either variable valve timing or Active Fuel Management. It is rated at 295-302 hp (220-225 kW) and 305 ft•lbf (414 N•m) of torque for all applications.
LY2 applications:
 

Last edited by Razoo; 08-18-2011 at 07:23 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
In2Trux
Off Topic
0
06-06-2011 09:36 AM
truckys
Chevy Silverado/ GMC Sierra Forum
0
01-15-2008 07:33 AM
truckys
Chevy Silverado/ GMC Sierra Forum
0
01-15-2008 07:28 AM
graystang88
Vehicles for Sale
0
06-26-2006 12:27 AM



Quick Reply: Used Chevy trucks ?.....



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:18 AM.