New Member Area Are you new? WELCOME! Check in, tell us about yourself and your ride.

Hey Gang!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 01-08-2013, 06:18 PM
Metalian's Avatar
Beginner
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 5
Default Hey Gang!

New guy to the forums here. Have a '93 GMC 1500 with the standard 4.3 with headers and a piggy-back chip. On a CST 6" lift with 35's. Looking to peruse the forums to see what I can do to get some more ponies out of it without swapping out the motor.
 
  #2  
Old 01-08-2013, 09:29 PM
In2Trux's Avatar
Administrator
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Northern Ont
Posts: 1,743
Default

Welcome to Truck Forums
Glad you joined, Enjoy your stay
 
  #3  
Old 01-08-2013, 11:31 PM
RustyFordLover's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Fairbanks Alaska
Posts: 492
Default

Welcome. Isn't the 4.3 a V-6? For some reason I'm thinking that the smallest V-8 was the 4.8, and the 4.6 was the same bigger V-6 they put in the Astro van, but that may have been a 4.0.
 
  #4  
Old 01-09-2013, 06:14 PM
Metalian's Avatar
Beginner
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 5
Default

Originally Posted by RustyFordLover
Welcome. Isn't the 4.3 a V-6? For some reason I'm thinking that the smallest V-8 was the 4.8, and the 4.6 was the same bigger V-6 they put in the Astro van, but that may have been a 4.0.
Yep, not happy with it, but it's super reliable and pretty fuel efficient!
 
  #5  
Old 01-11-2013, 05:31 AM
ItBeMe's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: On planet earth & in Hotlanta Ga.
Posts: 161
Default

Just my 2 cents but the 4.3 was great in the S10 but I feel it was to small for a full size truck and for the money to get more out of it is a waste of time and money.

But welcome to the forum.
 
  #6  
Old 01-11-2013, 11:01 AM
RustyFordLover's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Fairbanks Alaska
Posts: 492
Default

The 4.3 is a great engine. I have one with over 450,000 miles and still starts and runs like brand new, and I have raped the crap out of it (its in a two wheel drive astro van, im 19...so yea)

In my opinion, I would leave the 4.3 in it, but I never would have lifted the truck, not with that engine. With these smaller engines, when you add the weight of the bigger tires, you now only lose HP, you also lose MPG. With slightly over stock sized tires on the van I have (It has two hockey pucks jammed under the rear springs...), I was getting about 24-26 MPG, And it still had enough to do some pretty good burnouts. The 4.3 is about as bullet prove as they come.

Now, go google Chevy with the 4.3 and a turbo. Lots of people have done it to get the HP of a small V8, and still get the good MPG. Kind of like the Ford Eco Boost.
 
  #7  
Old 01-13-2013, 07:25 AM
Diesel Dan's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Warren, Ohio
Posts: 190
Default

Originally Posted by RustyFordLover
Welcome. Isn't the 4.3 a V-6? For some reason I'm thinking that the smallest V-8 was the 4.8, and the 4.6 was the same bigger V-6 they put in the Astro van, but that may have been a 4.0.
The 4.0 and 4.6 are Ford engines.
The 4.3 is the only V6 GM has been using in their trucks since the late '80s when the S10 had the 2.8/3.1 option.
FWIW, Chevy had a 4.3L(262CID) V8 in the '70s

Originally Posted by Metalian
New guy to the forums here. Have a '93 GMC 1500 with the standard 4.3 with headers and a piggy-back chip. On a CST 6" lift with 35's. Looking to peruse the forums to see what I can do to get some more ponies out of it without swapping out the motor.
I'd consider swapping in a TBI 350 rather than modding a 4.3L for that truck.
 
  #8  
Old 01-13-2013, 04:21 PM
RustyFordLover's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Fairbanks Alaska
Posts: 492
Default

Originally Posted by Diesel Dan
The 4.0 and 4.6 are Ford engines.
The 4.3 is the only V6 GM has been using in their trucks since the late '80s when the S10 had the 2.8/3.1 option.
FWIW, Chevy had a 4.3L(262CID) V8 in the '70s


I'd consider swapping in a TBI 350 rather than modding a 4.3L for that truck.
Somehow I accidently hit 4.6 in my previous post. I meant 4.3.
 
  #9  
Old 01-14-2013, 07:55 AM
Diesel Dan's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Warren, Ohio
Posts: 190
Default

Originally Posted by RustyFordLover
Somehow I accidently hit 4.6 in my previous post. I meant 4.3.
Dang keyboards, type what I want not what I hit!
 
  #10  
Old 01-28-2013, 09:32 AM
In2Trux's Avatar
Administrator
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Northern Ont
Posts: 1,743
Default

Originally Posted by ThereGraye
Somehow I accidently hit 4.6 in my previous post. I meant 4.3.

!!! SPAMMER !!! Don't click on his signature link
 


Quick Reply: Hey Gang!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:55 AM.